Dude, why?
Watched Terminator2 over the weekend with kiddo. So, yesterday in car:
"Mom, if the leader of the men was alive in future, then obviously the robot didn't kill him back when he was a baby. And if the boy had been killed in the past then there would have been no need in the future to send a robot back in time because there would have been no leader. I don't get this."
"Mom, if the leader of the men was alive in future, then obviously the robot didn't kill him back when he was a baby. And if the boy had been killed in the past then there would have been no need in the future to send a robot back in time because there would have been no leader. I don't get this."
I hate saying, "I have no clue", but....
Comments